Friday, October 18, 2019
Worker's compensation Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
Worker's compensation - Case Study Example The workersââ¬â¢ compensation law favors workersââ¬â¢ case and employers feel cheated as the law does not allow them any leverage. The amendments in the law have given it more teeth, allowing employers to contest and put their case for fairer judgment. Spurlock asserts that employersââ¬â¢ spend considerable amount of money in promoting safety measures including training of employees, providing safety devices and even conducting drug and alcohol testing for workplace safety. Thus, they have legitimate reasons to get upset when the workersââ¬â¢ are awarded compensation unfairly as the injury occurs due workersââ¬â¢ violation of safety rules. He has analyzed safety misconduct defenses in the three states so that insurers and employers can anticipate the essential issues while raising the safety misconduct defense. In Kentucky, workerââ¬â¢s compensation statutory favors workersââ¬â¢ case and provides 15% reduction in compensation if the worker had failed to utilize the safety appliances or overlooked safety rules. Intoxication must be the primary proximate cause and employeeââ¬â¢s culpability must prove ââ¬Ëwillful misconductââ¬â¢ in order to strengthen the case of employers. Safety misconduct in Indiana provides complete affirmative defense for failing to use safety devices or obey safety rules. It also incorporates employeesââ¬â¢ intoxication but does not emphasize on it being primary proximate cause and refers to ââ¬Ëknowingââ¬â¢ of the rules. In Tennessee, the statute provides complete affirmative defense for intoxication, drug use or willful violation of safety rules. But it is silent on obeying safety rules pertaining to the use of safety devices and Tennesseeââ¬â¢s courts have not found the non usage of safety devices as willful misconduct. In both the states, there is subtle importance that is placed on the proximate cause, especially in cases of intoxication for awarding or denying compensation to the workers. Spurlock article has analyzed multiple cases of workersââ¬â¢
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.